Abstract

The ability to perceive and exercise control is a major contributor to our mental and physical wellbeing. When faced with uncontrollable aversive stimuli, organisms develop heightened anxiety and become unwilling to exert effort to avoid the stimuli. In contrast, when faced with controllable aversive stimuli, organisms demonstrate behavioral vigor via avoidance attempts toward trying to seek and exercise control over the environment. As such, controllability confers protective effects against reduced avoidance motivation trigged by aversive environments. These observations beg the question of whether controllability can be potent enough to reverse passivity following repeated exposure to uncontrollable aversive stimuli and how this protective effect is encoded neurally. Human participants performed a Control in Aversive Domain (CAD) task where they were first subjected to a series of repeated uncontrollable aversive stimuli (i.e., aversive tones) across several contexts that were followed by a series of controllable aversive stimuli in a novel context. Faced with persistent uncontrollability, participants significantly reduced their avoidance attempts over time and biased toward giving up. However, the subsequent presence of controllability rescued participants’ avoidance behavior. Strikingly, participants who responded more strongly to the protective effects of control also had greater ventromedial prefrontal cortical (vmPFC) activation—a region previously observed to be associated with encoding the subjective value of control. Taken together, these findings highlighted the protective effect conferred by perceived control against passivity and offered insights into the potential role of the vmPFC in controllable environments, with implications for understanding the beneficial influence of perceived control on adaptive behavior.

Highlights

  • Our sense of control is governed by our perceived ability to influence the environment

  • For the first-level general linear models (GLM) analysis, we modeled participantspecific design matrices for each run with the following regressors: (1) a linear regressor encoding the aversive cue period with duration corresponding to 4 s and intensity set to one; (2) a linear regressor encoding the neutral cue period with duration corresponding to 4 s and intensity set to one; (3) a linear regressor encoding the aversive tone period with duration corresponding to 4 s and intensity set to one; (4) a linear regressor encoding the neutral tone period with duration corresponding to 4 s and intensity set to one

  • Uncontrollable and Controllable Phases In our behavioral findings, we showed that participants made significantly more avoidance behaviors in the controllable

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our sense of control is governed by our perceived ability to influence the environment. In the same vein, having this perception of control is often accompanied by stronger intrinsic motivation to learn to avoid or escape from aversive stimuli (Holmes and Jackson, 1975; Taub and Dollinger, 1975; Maier and Seligman, 1976; Quaglieri, 1980; Feather and Volkmer, 1988; Trusty and Macan, 1995). Given these findings, it is argued that perceived control over the environment has a protective effect on an organism’s avoidance motivation, in an aversive environment that otherwise tends to induce passivity. One open question that follows is whether the protective effect conferred by perceived control can reverse passivity associated with repeated exposure to uncontrollable aversive environment

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call