Abstract
This article focuses on the Hilton v. Hallmark decision issued by the 9th Circuit in 2009. Ultimately, the article criticises the ‘transformative use’ standard articulated by the California Supreme Court for evaluating right of publicity claims. Additionally, the article advocates for a more consistent standard which adequately balances celebrity interests with First Amendment free speech rights.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.