Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study a biorefinery integrated district heating (DH) and individual and central bioheating systems in an electricity intensive energy system to identify the prospects of bioenergy technologies over other conventional technologies in a long time horizon (2009–2030). The model maximises the societal welfare. Two gasification based biorefinery plants were selected: a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) biodiesel and a dimethyl ether (DME) biorefinery. A base case and three alternative scenarios with an annual 2.5% electricity and biomass price escalation rate were formulated. The results showed that a minimum of 6 €/GJ biofuel subsidy is required to initiate investments in a DME biorefinery, while a minimum of 12 €/GJ is required for FT-biodiesel biorefinery at higher energy prices. For biomass combined heat and power (CHP) competitiveness in DH, electricity price is found to be the most determining factor over biomass price. In individual and central heating, despite the high electricity tax, pellet boilers were found to be less competitive than heat pumps and electric heaters, primarily due to high pellet price. In conclusion, earmarking biomass in DH for CHP and biorefineries and heat pumps in individual, central heating and DH are found to be an optimal solution.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
