Abstract
Chicago, Oct. 28, 1898. <h3>To the Editor:</h3> —In the October issue of the<i>Chicago Medical Recorder</i>, there appears a report of some remarks I made at a recent meeting of the Chicago Medical Society, in reference to the proposed "Medical Examiners' Bill" for Illinois. The report simply contains my objection, and makes no mention of the remedy I suggested for the evil pointed out. I happen to know that this omission is not the fault of the stenographer. For this reason I ask theJournalto privilege me with a few remarks on the proposed bill. This Medical Bill, originated and prepared by physicians, is accordingly<i>pro bono publico</i>, i. e., for the purpose of excluding from the practice of medicine all persons not educationally fitted according to orthodox ideas. This is a laudable purpose and a child of a good principle. But the promoters of the proposed bill, as
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
