Abstract

Because of the comprehensiveness and urgency of environmental challenges, every stakeholder needs to be engaged in reducing environmental impacts. The healthcare sector has rarely been studied, despite its intense effects on the environment, particularly through generating various forms of hazardous waste and intensively consuming energy and water. Many healthcare facilities exist in South Korea, and every citizen frequently visits hospitals thanks to the convenient system. To reduce the environmental impacts of the healthcare sector, the South Korean government has implemented various policy measures aimed at promoting environmental management in that sector. This study evaluated the eco-efficiencies of 21 hospitals from 2012 to 2015 using data envelopment assessment (DEA), used the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to analyze hospital staff members’ answers to a questionnaire asking about the relative importance and performance of individual environmental management tasks, and also identified environmental management tasks that should be prioritized by building an importance-performance analysis (IPA) matrix using those questionnaire responses. This study found that eco-efficiencies have improved during the period, and that mandatory policy measures were more effective than voluntary agreements for improving eco-efficiency. This implies that rigorous reporting and monitoring should be implemented along with any voluntary agreement. In addition, this study found that the top priorities are “establishment of vision and strategy for environmental management” and “organization of task team for environmental management and task assignment”. This shows the necessity of additional policy measures, such as training or consulting to promote the priorities. In addition to policy recommendations for diffusing environmental management in the South Korean healthcare sector, the methodological approach sheds light for researchers interested in environmental management in the healthcare sector because previous studies depended on qualitative approaches, particularly case studies.

Highlights

  • The 2015 Decision of the Conference of Parties (COP) in Paris emphasizes the participation of non-Party stakeholders, including cities and other subnational authorities

  • environmental management (EM) has not attracted the attention of hospital leadership because the principal goal of the healthcare sector is “achieving high value for patients . . . defined as the health outcomes achieved per dollar spent” [4]; EM needs to be promoted in this sector because its operation is close to the people and more likely to directly affect people’s lives

  • This study evaluates changes in the eco-efficiency of the South Korean healthcare sector based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 2015 Decision of the Conference of Parties (COP) in Paris emphasizes the participation of non-Party stakeholders, including cities and other subnational authorities. The decision encourages Parties to cooperate closely with non-Party stakeholders in an effort to strengthen and expand mitigation actions [1]. The transnational actions of non-Party stakeholders become “the heart of the new climate regime” [2] because every sector’s participation is paramount for coping with environmental problems and attaining sustainable development goals. The environmental footprint of the healthcare sector is closely related to the use of devices and chemicals to treat patients [3]. EM has not attracted the attention of hospital leadership because the principal goal of the healthcare sector is “achieving high value for patients . EM has not attracted the attention of hospital leadership because the principal goal of the healthcare sector is “achieving high value for patients . . . defined as the health outcomes achieved per dollar spent” [4]; EM needs to be promoted in this sector because its operation is close to the people and more likely to directly affect people’s lives

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.