Abstract

This work studied the oxidative degradation performance of manganese gluconate as a liquid redox sulfur recovery (LRSR) agent. The degradation of gluconate in an aerated sulfide containing 0.1 M manganese/0.8 M gluconate/pH 13 solution was 11% in 47 h and 20% in 100 h of reaction time. With the total price of chelates being more or less comparable, these were superior to the degradation resistance of EDTA chelate in a solution of 0.1 M iron/0.2 M EDTA/pH 8 which degraded by about 30% in 47 h, and NTA in Fe-NTA (0.1 M metal/0.2 M chelate/pH 6.5), which was degraded by 40% in 100 h of reaction time. At pH of 13, 0.1 M Metal, and 0.8 M gluconate, manganese degraded gluconate more severely than iron and copper. At a lower chelate to metal molar ratio (RCM) of 2 and as well as at a lower pH of 10, the manganese gluconate degradation, expressed as relative concentration to its initial concentration, was faster than at RCM of 8 and pH of 13. All of these observations can be explained among others by the well-known Fenton reaction hydroxyl radicals mechanism as the main cause of the degradation process.

Highlights

  • Natural gas is widely utilized in various industries as an energy source or raw material

  • In verifying the composition of degradation products, Piche found to 80% of this consisted of Fe(OH)3 while the remaining 20% was Fe Chelate adsorbed in the product

  • The chelates in solutions of manganese gluconate, Fe-EDTA and FeNTA were shown to be quite stable in the aerated condition in the absence of sulfides

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Natural gas is widely utilized in various industries as an energy source or raw material. For this scale, it is more economical than the classical gas-phase indirect oxidation Claus process. It is more economical than the classical gas-phase indirect oxidation Claus process This would be true for acid gas with low H2S/CO2 molar ratio (1–3%), as it does not need an acid gas enrichment unit. Compared to the probably somewhat less expensive direct gas-phase oxidation technology LRSR can give considerably higher sulfur recovery efficiency [1]. LRSR has better tolerance towards heavy hydrocarbons, BTX, and mercaptans Despite all of these advantages, the use of LRSR technology was economically restricted to low sulfur capacity due to two major limitations: (1) high solution circulation rate and (2) high chemical make-up due to rapid oxidative degradation of chelates

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call