Abstract

Since 2013, Kaiser Permanente Northern California has engaged in a systematic effort to elicit, document, and honor the care preferences of patients as they near the end of life. This is done through its Advanced Steps program, in which selected patients discuss their preferences for future medical care with their healthcare agent during a structured conversation with a trained advance care planning facilitator. The facilitator then translates the patient's wishes into an actionable medical order set using a Physician's Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form. We wanted to know whether these patients' recorded wishes were concordant with care received at the end of life. To evaluate, we conducted an in-depth chart review of 300 patients who died in 2015 and had participated in the program. We determined that 290 patients received concordant care, whereas three patients received care discordant with their wishes before death. Seven patients did not have sufficient information in their record to determine concordance. Interestingly, we found care preferences often changed over time; ∼20% of patients revised their end-of-life preferences after having the facilitated conversation, with most of those patients opting for less intensive care. Most changes to preferences were made verbally in the final setting of care. While advance care planning and the POLST form provide invaluable tools for recording patients' wishes, our study highlights a need to track patients' wishes as they evolve over time and a need for ongoing, real-time conversations about goals of care, even after a POLST is completed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call