Abstract

BackgroundThe work ability index (WAI) is a frequently used tool in occupational health to identify workers at risk for a reduced work performance and for work-related disability. However, information about the prognostic value of the WAI to identify workers at risk for sickness absence is scarce.ObjectivesTo investigate the prognostic value of the WAI for sickness absence, and whether the discriminative ability differs across demographic subgroups.MethodsAt baseline, the WAI (score 7-49) was assessed among 1,331 office workers from a Dutch financial service company. Sickness absence was registered during 12-months follow-up and categorised as 0 days, 0<days<5, 5≤days<15, and ≥15 days in one year. Associations between WAI and sickness absence were estimated by multinomial regression analyses. Discriminative ability of the WAI was assessed by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) and Ordinal c-index (ORC). Test characteristics were determined for dichotomised outcomes. Additional analyses were performed for separate WAI dimensions, and subgroup analyses for demographic groups.ResultsA lower WAI was associated with sickness absence (≥15 days vs. 0 days: per point lower WAI score OR=1.27; 95%CI 1.21-1.33). The WAI showed reasonable ability to discriminate between categories of sickness absence (ORC=0.65; 95%CI 0.63-0.68). Highest discrimination was found for comparing workers with ≥15 sick days with 0 sick days (AUC=0.77) or with 1-5 sick days (AUC=0.69). At the cut-off for poor work ability (WAI≤27) the sensitivity to identify workers at risk for ≥15 sick days was 7.5%, the specificity 99.6%, and the positive predictive value 82%. The performance was similar across demographic subgroups.ConclusionsThe WAI could be used to identify workers at high risk for prolonged sickness absence. However, due to low sensitivity many workers will be missed. Hence, additional factors are required to better identify workers at highest risk.

Highlights

  • With an ageing population there is a need to retain healthy and productive workers

  • A lower work ability index (WAI) was associated with sickness absence (!15 days vs. 0 days: per point lower WAI score OR=1.27; 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) 1.21-1.33)

  • The WAI showed reasonable ability to discriminate between categories of sickness absence (ORC=0.65; 95%CI 0.63-0.68)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With an ageing population there is a need to retain healthy and productive workers. Prevention of, especially long-term, sickness absence can contribute to this goal. Several studies have suggested that the work ability index (WAI) could be used as a predictive tool to identify workers at high risk for long-term sickness absence or disability benefits [7,8,9]. The WAI is a frequently used tool in occupational health to assess a person’s work ability on a sum score between 7 and 49 in order to prevent temporary or permanent exit from work [10,11]. There is evidence that poor or moderate work ability, as compared to excellent work ability, is related to, especially long-term, sickness absence. The work ability index (WAI) is a frequently used tool in occupational health to identify workers at risk for a reduced work performance and for work-related disability. Information about the prognostic value of the WAI to identify workers at risk for sickness absence is scarce

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call