Abstract
Controversy still exists with regard to the prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in ovarian cancer. A systematic search based on the databases of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Dataset were conducted up to March 22, 2022. We included both retrospective and prospective observational studies with comparison of prognosis of patients who were divided into two groups: low and high PNI group. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied to evaluate the quality of enrolled studies. All analyses were performed using Stata software. The pooled results were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Finally, 12 studies involving 3,190 patients were included. High PNI group had a significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53–0.84), progression-free survival (PFS, HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63–0.87), and cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20–0.94) compared with the low PNI group. The sensitivity analysis and publication bias indicated our results were reliable. PNI could be applied as a promising index to predict prognosis in ovarian cancer. Our results need to be validated in future studies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
