Abstract
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive disease and once symptomatic and heart failure (HF) develops is associated with poor prognosis. The degree of the pathophysiological and structural changes in AS are associated with poor survival. Pulmonary congestion is an almost universal finding in patients with HF. Lung ultrasound (LUS) evaluation of B-lines has been proposed as a simple, non-invasive tool to assess pulmonary congestion. Aim To assess pulmonary congestion with LUS in patients with AS and to define the prognostic value of B-lines. Methods 84 consecutive patients (43 women, mean age 74 ± 9 years) with moderate or severe AS were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were as follows: moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, moderate or severe mitral regurgitation, cardiomyopathies, pulmonary disease, renal failure. At baseline, all patients underwent comprehensive echocardiography examination and LUS according to 28 scanning-site assessment. Patients were followed-up after enrollment to establish the prognostic value of LUS. A composite endpoint was considered, including: aortic valve replacement due to deterioration of patient condition or progression of AS from moderate to severe, death (any cause), hospitalization due to acute heart failure or progression of chronic heart failure which required hospitalization. Results We found a severe number of B-lines (total B-lines ≥30) in 31% of AS patients. The number of B-lines was correlated with estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (p < 0,005, r= 0,52) and increased along with NYHA class (p < 0,001) Figure 1. Patients with ≥30 B-lines had more events during the 13,4 ± 6 months follow-up (p < 0,001, Log-rank: 10,7; Figure 2). Conclusion Assessing B-lines in AS is a simple, feasible method to detect pulmonary congestion. The number of B-lines correlates with hemodynamic changes caused by AS and with the functional status of the patients. A severe degree of sonographic pulmonary congestion is associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Abstract Figure. FC class vs. Blines and prognostic value
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.