The prognostic significance of non-lymphoid immune cells of the tumor microenvironment, including neutrophils, eosinophils, and mast cells in breast carcinomas

Abstract

Background and objectiveThe prognostic importance of lymphoid cells in the tumor microenvironment and their effect on treatment response have been demonstrated in many cancer types. However, there are limited studies on non-lymphoid immune cells. Conflicting results have been obtained regarding the effects of these cells on prognosis. Materials and methodsA total of 331 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer were included. Patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those with distant metastasis were excluded. CD 15 immunohistochemistry was performed to detect tumor-infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) and eosinophils (TIEs), while Toluidine Blue histochemistry was performed to detect tumor-infiltrating mast cells (TIMs). ResultsHigh TINs were statistically associated with low ER expression (p < 0.001), low PR expression (p = 0.001), high Ki-67 proliferation index (p = 0.008), and HER2/TN molecular subtypes (p = 0.001). High TIEs were associated with low ER expression (p = 0.001), high Ki67 proliferation index (p = 0.005), and HER2/TN molecular subtype (p = 0.002). High TIMs were associated with high PR expression (p = 0.024), low Ki-67 proliferation index (p = 0.003), and high survival rate (p = 0.006). TIMs and TIEs were good prognostic factors for overall survival in Luminal A and Luminal B subtypes, while TINs and TIEs were found to be independent risk factors for disease-free survival. ConclusionThe evaluation of components of the tumor microenvironment including TINs, TIEs, and TIMs is easy and practical. High TIMs and TIEs are independent prognostic factors, especially in luminal molecular subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. However, to use this parameter in routine pathology practice, more studies from different centers and standard evaluation are needed.