The Prognostic Significance of C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients.

Abstract

BackgroundThe ratio of C-reactive protein to albumin (CAR) is an inflammatory marker that has been demonstrated to be a simple and reliable prognostic factor in several solid tumours and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). However, no studies have investigated the prognostic value of the CAR in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML).Objectives and MethodsWe retrospectively analysed 212 newly diagnosed non-M3 AML patients. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) method, the optimal cut-off value for CAR was determined. We investigated the correlations of the pretreatment CAR levels with clinical characteristics, treatment response of induction chemotherapy, overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). We also assessed the prognostic value of the CAR compared with other inflammation-based prognostic parameters by the area under the curve (AUC).ResultsAccording to the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off value of CAR was 1.015. CAR was associated with age, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, albumin levels, ferritin levels, bone marrow blast percentage, French-American-British (FAB) classification, immunophenotype and 2017 European Leukemia Net (2017 ELN) risk stratification. Importantly, we found that high CAR was a powerful indicator of a lower complete remission (CR) rate (p<0.001), worse OS (p<0.001) and worse EFS (p<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that a high CAR was associated with shorter OS and EFS in patients with intermediate risk stratification or those aged ≤65 years or those without haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In the multivariate analysis, the CAR was an independent prognostic factor for OS and EFS. Furthermore, the predictive value of CAR for OS is superior to that of CRP, albumin and GPS in de novo AML patients aged ≤65 years old.ConclusionCAR is a simple and effective prognostic marker in patients with AML. It could be an additional prognostic factor that help further precise the current risk stratification of non-M3 AML, particularly for patients in intermediate risk stratification and those aged ≤65 years and those who did not undergo HSCT.