Abstract

Objectives: Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is frequently performed in patients with ulcerative colitis and factors suspected of increasing the risk of postoperative infectious complications. Using a three-stage approach may result in improvement in overall outcomes, because this leads to improvement in nutritional status and reduction of immunosuppressive doses. However, the influence of preoperative nutritional status on postoperative infectious complications after this procedure has not been examined. The aim of this study was to clarify the potential associations between nutritional status and postoperative infectious complications in patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Methods: The records of 110 patients who had undergone proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from January 2000 to March 2018 in Mie University and met the eligibility criteria were reviewed and possible associations between postoperative infectious complications and clinical factors were assessed. Results: Of the remaining 110 patients, 18 (16.4%) had developed postoperative infectious complications. Multivariate analysis revealed that operative bleeding ≥270 g and prognostic nutritional index <47 were significant predictors of postoperative infectious complications (P = 0.033, 0.0076, respectively). Various variables associated with immunosuppressives before ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were not associated with postoperative infectious complications. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that immunosuppressives have no association with postoperative infectious complications, whereas a poor prognostic nutritional index may be a significant predictor of postoperative infectious complications in patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call