Abstract
Previous reports demonstrated wide variations in contributions by EU Member States (MS) to the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) especially for border notifications, emphasising that MS with major entry points play a vital role in ensuring that EU food imports meet EU standards. To further explore the variation this paper aimed to examine notification practices among MS by comparing the levels of detection as a function of the total food imported and population. RASFF notifications issued between 2003 and 2007 were analysed using descriptive statistics and network analysis for differences in notification practice between MS. Major variations in contributions to the RASFF database were observed, which did not correlate with MS size or population. For the key contrast of ratio: 'border: non-border notifications', variations between 7%:89% were observed for the average monthly contributions and, import tonnage per border notification revealed up to 129-fold differences between MS. In conclusion, wide variations in food safety practice exist between MS, including both number and type of contributions to the RASFF database, with some MS being relatively highly active in the key class of border notifications. These findings should inform EU food safety enforcement policies and practices; and central resource allocations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
