The Processes of Fossilization

Abstract

You would be hard pressed to find a paleontological study that did not have some taphonomic component to it. In fact, has been criticized for being so broad a field of study as to render term taphonomy itself trifling. Yet, if we are interested in restor[ing] flesh and blood of fossil (p. 22), it is imperative to consider multifarious factors affecting processes of fossilization. Behrensmeyer and Kidwell (1985, p. 105) provided a modern working definition of taphonomy: the study of processes of preservation and how they affect information in fossil Their seminal review of field was coincident with a dramatic increase in research that took place in 1980's (Fig. 1). As with any field experiencing a renaissance, spawned a wealth of new research and literature. However, it now appears that growth in research experienced in mid-1980's has leveled off (Fig. 1). This would indicate that time is ripe for a synthesis. The Donovan book provides such a synthesis and is an excellent introduction to taphonomy. It includes a variety of topics ranging from theoretical considerations in estimating completeness of fossil record, to a chapter entitled: Bones as stones: contribution of vertebrate remains to lithologic The first three chapters cover: history of taphonomy; taphonomic processes and biases; and completeness of fossil record. These are provocative, well written and should be of general interest to all paleontologists. Cadee provides a scholarly account of development of as a distinct discipline. It is best work on this topic that I have read. His command of literature (well beyond modern works published in English) enables him to render a truly eclectic overview of field. This chapter would make an excellent reading assignment in any university-level paleontology course. The Parsons and Brett chapter on taphonomic processes and biases contains three sections: live/dead assemblage comparisons; taphonomic processes and properties; and taphofacies analysis. While they provide thorough reviews of these topics, they do not completely integrate these sections and show connections among these subdisciplines. Nonetheless, I wholly agree with their assessment that taphonomists are much