Abstract

The equilibrium dual discrete mathematical models of the problems of limit load analysis and optimization are investigated in the article. These models are presented in terms of static and kinematic formulation using equilibrium finite elements. In these mathematical models the possible discontinuities of displacement velocities are evaluated and the velocity of energy dissipation is estimated not only within the volume of finite elements, but at the plastic surfaces between elements. At first, on the basis of the energy principle of the maximum external power [1,2] the general mathematical models (3) and (7) of static formulation of limit load analysis and optimization problems are created. In these models the yield conditions are controlled not only within the volume, but also at the surfaces of finite elements. The equilibrium finite elements and interpolation functions of strains (9) are used for discretization of these models. The constancy of external power is taken as the optimum criterion. The discrete expressions of fundamental relationships—equilibrium and geometric equations, yield conditions (10)-(12) for finite element and (14)-(17) for the discrete model of a body are developed. The discrete expressions of yield conditions are given using the classic collocation methods: collocation at the point, collocation at the sphere (element) and Bubnov-Galiorkin's collocation method [11,12]. The equilibrium equations of discrete structure are developed on the basis of virtual displacement principle while geometrical equations are derived using virtual force principle. In contrast to the approach of other authors, yield conditions and geometrical equations are described not only within finite elements, but also at the surfaces between elements. That helps to design the dual discrete mathematical models of the problems (21)-(26), in which the discontinuities of displacement velocities and the velocity of energy dissipation in the place of those discontinuities are estimated. The mathematical models (22), (24), (26), (29) and (32) of kinematic problem formulation are developed from sensible static formulations by Lagrange's multiplier method. The modified mathematical models (27)-(29) are presented. In these models the equilibrium equations are eliminated or the geometrical equations are transformed into compatible equations of plastic stress velocities, in this way decreasing the number of equations and unknown values. The dependence of the numerical results (limit load) of the frame on the approximation degree of bending moments, as well as on the discretization method of yield conditions are illustrated. In table 1 the values of limit loading parameter F 0 and their error of calculation ΔF 0 (per cent, in comparison with the analytic solution F 0 = 0,4662M 0) are presented. They are given for the first and second order finite elements with linear and parabolic distribution of bending moments using different discrete yield conditions and a different number of finite elements. The numerical result shows, that the discretization of yield conditions by Bubnov-Galiorkin's method gives the best accuracy and stable solutions. By discretizing yield conditions using the point's collocation and collocation at the element, the accurancy of numerical results depends not only on the number of elements, but also on a more or less successful choice of finite elements net.

Highlights

  • CTpOHTCH paBHOBCCHbiCCKOpOCTCH rrepeMCIUCHHH H CKOpOCTH ,UUCCHIIaUHH 3HCprHH B MCCTaX 3THX pa1pb1BOB. PaccMarpnBaeTcH .>KCCTKOIIJiaCTII'IecKoe TCJIO, fCOMCTpnqecKHC rrapaMCTpbl, YCJIOBIDI OIIHpaHIDI H

  • The equilibrium dual discrete mathematical models of the problems of limit load analysis and optimization are investigated in the article

  • These models are presented in terms

Read more

Summary

CTpOHTCH paBHOBCCHbiC

CKOpOCTCH rrepeMCIUCHHH H CKOpOCTH ,UUCCHIIaUHH 3HCprHH B MCCTaX 3THX pa1pb1BOB. PaccMarpnBaeTcH .>KCCTKOIIJiaCTII'IecKoe TCJIO, fCOMCTpnqecKHC rrapaMCTpbl, YCJIOBIDI OIIHpaHIDI H. 3a.r.a'18 paC'IeTa napaMe'l'pa npe.r.eJibHOH uarpy3KH flpii Ja.UaHHOM JaKOHe pacnpe.ue.rieHIUI narpyJKII F(x) =FoTt(x) onpe.ueJUieTcH napaMeTp npe.ueJibHOif: narpyJKH F0 II H)J,C KOHCTPYKUIIII, OTBeqaiOIUIIe IIJI3CTnqecKOMY pa3pymeHIIIO TeJia. Ha ocnoBe cTaTnqecKoif: TeopeMbl npe.ueJibHOro paBHOBeCIUI ( 1) TipII 1IKCIIpOB3HHbiX CKOpOCTHX nepeMeiUeHIIM (2). CncTeMy orpannqermif: 3a_uaqn, onpe.ueJUIIOIUYIO MHO)I{CCTBO CTaTnqecKH .UOnyCTHMbiX BCKTOpOB HaiipH)I{CHHM, COCT3BJUIIOT ypaBHCHIUI paBHOBCCIUI II yCJIOBIUl Te~eCTH BHYTpH KOHeqHbiX 3JICMCHTOB (nepBaH CTpOKa) H Ha TIOBepXHOCTHX 3JICMCHTOB. 3a YCJIOBHe OITTHMaJibHOCTH ITpHHHMaeTCH ycJIOBHe ITOCTOHHCTBa MOIUHOCTH Harpy3KH [Ar)cr;(x) -p1(x)=0 eS1-, t ecffv; -[At)cri (x) +Pt (x) = 0 Est' t Erff;; f1(Pr(x)) ~ for(C1(x)) eStt t ecff. [cU']cr k(x) =0, f(crk(x)) ~ f0(Ck(x)) eVk, k e:2/C; rt(P;) ~ fo1(C((x>) eS(, tedT; rt(Pi) ~ fot(ct) est. C u:eJII>IO )'MeHnllleHHH qncJia HeH3BeCTHhiX u:eJiecoo6pa3HO .llJIH HltX rrpnMeHHTb TaKHe ycJIOBHH corrp.IDKeHHH n Te~ecTn: He y.uoBJieTBOpHIOT .un

COCTaBITCHllll ypaBHCHllH paBHOBCCMH
HBJIHIOTCH COOTBCTCTBCHHO BCKTOphl
CKOpOCTll nepeMCIUCHJtit
BnyTpCHHIIX CIIJI
CeTKH TOqHOCTb peJyJibTaTOB pacqeTa rrpH
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call