Abstract

This research explained about problematic execution of criminal sanctions for minimum fine in 1945 constitution number 35/2009 concerning on narcotics in legal region of Dharmasraya District Attorney Office and the effort to overcome those problematic based on constitution number 35/2019 concerning in narcotics in legal region of Dharmasraya District Attorney Office. This research used criminal theory and law enforcement theory, the method used here is empirical research category and research location within Dharmasraya District Attorney. The result of this research indicates that the whole problem of criminal concern in narcotics which handled by Dharmasraya District Attorney, none of the convicted people implementing judge decision of criminal sanction. Most of the convicts choose to take a prison sanction as a substitute of paying penalty money rather than paying penalty money itself. There are two main factors of why most convicts choosing that decision, economic limitation of every convicts and the possibility of every convicts to take a prison punishment with a quite short period and it considered better than paying penalty as punishment. On its implementation of making criminal punishment decision, public attorney could not make a maximum effort to make convicts obeying the punishment penalty. Public attorney only able to asking for charge, however if the convicts cannot pay the punishment money, they will get a declaration letter of incapable to pay and being imprisoned.

Highlights

  • Criminal Law contain of the sanctions over infraction of law, with a larger space and bigger impact

  • This research explained about problematic execution of criminal sanctions for minimum fine in 1945 constitution number 35/2009 concerning on narcotics in legal region of Dharmasraya District Attorney Office and the effort to overcome those problematic based on constitution number 35/2019 concerning in narcotics in legal region of Dharmasraya District Attorney Office

  • The result of this research indicates that the whole problem of criminal concern in narcotics which handled by Dharmasraya District Attorney, none of the convicted people implementing judge decision of criminal sanction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Criminal Law contain of the sanctions over infraction of law, with a larger space and bigger impact. The research problem is “what kind of execution problematic of criminal sanction special minimum inside Constitution 35 year 2009 about narcotics in legal region Dharmasraya State Prosecution?”. Population of this research contain of some inmate of narcotics misuse who is being punished within criminal minimum penalty based on the decision of Muaro District Court, Prosecutor of Dharmasraya District Attorney as the executor of court decision and the member of Muaro Sijunjung Correctional Institution. Sample of this research is 5 (five) inmates who is being punished within criminal minimum penalty based on the decision of Muaro District Court, 3 (three) Prosecutors of Dharmasraya District Attorney as the executor of court decision, and a staff of Muaro Sijunjung Correctional Institution. Writer researcher needs to provide the detail of criminal act and narcotics criminal category based on its category on Constitution 35/2009 concerning on narcotics (narcotics)

Penalty Payment
Non Plant Non Plant
Weight more
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call