Abstract
Gaming Law ReviewVol. 11, No. 4 ArticlesThe Problem with Good Faith: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act a Decade after SeminoleChris RauschChris RauschSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:23 Aug 2007https://doi.org/10.1089/glr.2007.11403AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byExplaining Indigenous Peoples’ Success in State Supreme Courts: Party Capability, Judicial Selection, and Representation21 October 2022 | Journal of Law and Courts, Vol. 9, No. 1Manufacturing regional disparity in the pursuit of economic equality: Alberta's First Nations Gaming Policy, 2006-201024 September 2012 | The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien, Vol. 57, No. 1The Political Economy of American Indian GamingAnnual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 4, No. 1The 2007 Seminole-Florida Gambling Compact Robert M. Jarvis26 February 2008 | Gaming Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 1 Volume 11Issue 4Aug 2007 InformationMary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Chris Rausch.The Problem with Good Faith: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act a Decade after Seminole.Gaming Law Review.Aug 2007.423-435.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr.2007.11403Published in Volume: 11 Issue 4: August 23, 2007PDF download
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
