Abstract
The authors discuss basic approaches to the problem of defining euthanasia. The definition should maintain the distinction between active and passive and between voluntary and involuntary euthanasia. Some of the recent views of the ethical and moral aspects are mentioned, as well as the reasons for terminating resuscitation in persons who suffer ‘brain death’ (permanent central nervous system) dysfunction. This problem is a matter of great urgency particularly in the burn centres, dealing with old patients. The authors base the discussion on their clinical experience showing that it is sometimes better that a person should die than continue living in certain desperate states, such as unbearable suffering, severe debilitation, permanent coma etc. However, the problem of euthanasia is in conclusion considered as an open system of question, where the answers are not unanimous. They are complicated with respect to the ethical, forensic aspects and also to the peculiarities of psychology.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.