Abstract

Introduction. When conducting PCR (polymerase chain reaction) testing of biospecimens for SARS-CoV-2 RNA at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the laboratory service in Russia and foreign countries encountered problems related to the accuracy of diagnostics and obtaining false negative, false positive, and dubious results. The objective of this work was to analyze current literature on the problem of false positive and dubious results of RT-PCR testing for COVID-19. Material and methods. We selected Russian and foreign English-language publications devoted to organization of laboratory diagnostics of the novel coronavirus disease, challenges of PCR testing for SARS and MERS, and general issues of DNA contamination in a PCR laboratory for 2012–2020. We also reviewed current regulations and guidelines for COVID-19 diagnostic testing. Results. The analysis of factors leading to contamination of specimens with nucleic acids in the laboratories performing massive COVID-19 PCR testing during the pandemic showed that the main reasons for contamination included a large number of tests, accumulation of samples in the laboratory, and the increased amount of wastes containing amplification products. Cross-contamination occurs due to technical errors in the course of laboratory manipulations at the stages of sample preparation and inactivation, RNA isolation, and addition of cDNA/RNA or positive control samples to the reaction mixture. Pollution of laboratory working areas with amplicons arising from the opening of tubes and plates containing PCR products is the main cause of total contamination in the laboratory. Signs of cross-contamination include the increase in the proportion of positive samples with low threshold cycle values and detection of a positive signal from negative control samples at RNA isolation and amplification stages. A positive result for all samples in a round, including negative control samples, is a marker of “total contamination” in the laboratory. In addition to contamination, formation of nonspecific PCR products at late reaction cycles and nonspecific fluorescence of the reaction mixture, which occurs when reagent storage temperatures are not observed, may also lead to false positive results. Conclusion. To prevent contamination in a PCR laboratory, strict control over the flow of test samples and medical wastes, regular analysis of the frequency of positive test results, and mandatory laboratory quality control of testing and DNA/RNA contamination are compulsory.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call