Abstract
ABSTRACT Twenty-four closely spaced samples of beach sand were collected on a grid pattern and subjected to heavy mineral analysis. Each sample was sieved to obtain two grades, from which the heavies were separated in bromoform. Twelve splits of a composite sample made from quartered portions of the original samples were similarly treated. The data obtained were used to evaluate the sampling and laboratory errors of heavy mineral analysis, with the relation E2 = (e1)2 + (e2)2, where E is the total observed error, e1 is the sampling error, and e2 is the laboratory error. The results showed that the average sampling error for the beach sand is about 10 per cent, but there is a particular sampling error associated with e ch mineral in the suite. The laboratory error of splitting, separating, and counting is of approximately the same order of magnitude as the sampling error. The individual observations show a fair agreement with the general theory of errors. An evaluation of current routines of heavy mineral analysis is made in the light of the data obtained.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.