Abstract
The negative relation between governance indices and acquisition performance weakens in the post Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) period. We examine whether firms remove anti-takeover provisions to eliminate the adverse impact of anti-takeover provisions. We find that strong external monitoring mechanisms such as the presence of public pension funds and large institutional investors leads firms to abolish some anti-takeover provisions and classified boards in particular. This partial elimination of anti-takeover provisions suggests a trade-off between benefit and cost of anti-takeover provisions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
