Abstract

AbstractWhile the downward mass flux in the Earth's deep interior is well constrained by seismic tomography, the upward flux is still poorly understood and debated. Recent tomography studies suggest that we are now starting to resolve deep mantle plume structures. However, a lack of uncertainty quantification impedes a full assessment of their significance and whether they are statistically distinct from noise. This work uses a spherical wavelet transform and random noise realizations to quantify the probability of deep plume‐like features in six recent global tomographic models. We find that out of 50 possible mantle deep plumes, 12 are highly likely, with probabilities larger than 80%, and 12 are likely, with probability between 70% and 80%. Objective, quantitative approaches as proposed in this study should be used for model interpretation. The five most likely deep mantle plumes are Tahiti, Macdonald, East Africa, Pitcairn, and Marquesas, which have some of the largest buoyancy fluxes estimated in a previous study that used hotspot swell volumes. This could resolve past discrepancies between deep mantle plumes inferred by visual analysis of tomography models and flux estimations from hotspot swell data. In addition, a notable unlikely deep mantle plume is Yellowstone, with probability lower than 50%. We also identify a likely deep mantle plume associated with the Amsterdam‐St Paul hotspot, a region scarcely discussed in previous studies and that deserves future investigation. Hence, our automated, objective approach is a valuable alternative approach for the quantitative interpretation of tomographic models.

Highlights

  • The upward flow in the Earth's mantle in the form of plumes is key for producing Earth's largest melting events, which are recorded in the geological record as large igneous provinces (LIPs) (Kellogg & Wasserburg, 1990)

  • We identify a likely deep mantle plume associated with the Amsterdam-St Paul hotspot, a region scarcely discussed in previous studies and that deserves future investigation

  • While South Africa is suggested to lay above a large superswell that has yet to reach the upper mantle, Tanzania/Kenya is above a deep mantle plume and Afar is above a possible dying plume that used up all the material in the core-mantle boundary (CMB) layer beneath the region (Davaille et al, 2005)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The upward flow in the Earth's mantle in the form of plumes is key for producing Earth's largest melting events, which are recorded in the geological record as large igneous provinces (LIPs) (Kellogg & Wasserburg, 1990). Mantle upwelling sources are classically seen as large plume heads of hot buoyant material, followed by a narrow tail rooted in a hot thermal boundary layer deep in the mantle (Campbell & Griffiths, 1990). This view has since evolved to include effects from the physical and chemical properties of the boundary layer (Lin & van Keken, 2006), resulting in what are called thermochemical plumes. A proposed mechanism for thermochemical plumes is subducted mantle material pushing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call