The Pringle manoeuvre should be avoided in hepatectomy for cancer patients due to its side effects on tumor recurrence and worse prognosis

Abstract

Curative hepatectomy is still the best therapeutic strategy for liver cancer treatment up to now. The Pringle manoeuvre has been commonly used to avoid massive blood loss during operation since its advent, which greatly accelerates the advance of liver surgery and oncological surgery. In the past century, more attentions have been paid to different effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury elicited by Pringle manoeuvre. Theses include its impacts on complex metabolic, immunological, and microvascular changes, which altogether might contribute to hepatocellular damage and dysfunction, and contribute to haemodynamic instability. Despite these adverse impacts, the short-term outcome of affected patients under hepatectomy was greatly improved with the advances of surgical techniques and perioperative management in recent years. While the long-term prognosis remains unsatisfactory due to a high incidence of intra/extrahepatic recurrence. The reason for it was not totally elucidated. Furthermore, the effect of the Pringle manoeuvre on the prognosis of oncologic patients and behavior of the tumor cell was not deliberately mentioned. This point was put forward to the front-desk by the specific phenomenon from recent animal studies. It is showed that ischemia-reperfusion injury of the liver remnant may be a significant factor to promote the tumor recurrence and metastasis. If it is a truth in human, there must be a big challenge to the Pringle manoeuvre. So we hypothesized that the long-term prognosis of cancer patients could be worsened by the ischemia-reperfusion injury elicited by Pringle manoeuvre during the hepatectomy and it should be revised, or even, avoided in future hepatectomy for oncologic patients. The less surgical stress including ischemia-reperfusion injury in the hepatic resection without Pringle manoeuvre might contribute to a better prognosis. To get a deeper understanding, prospective randomized clinical trials need to be done. It is surely supposed to provide more important information about the long-term effects of the Pringle manoeuvre, and to our hypothesis.