Abstract
‘Practice what you preach’ is a phrase occasionally used to refer to those not acting as they want others to act. There are countless opportunities in professional work and daily life to bring such criticism upon ourselves. While the subject is broad, this study focuses on the application of this idea in research practice, and more specifically in design research. One point of departure is the question: ‘how should we practice research if its results are products just like other products?’ The Principle of Reflexive Practice (PRP) states that considering the outcome of design research or research itself as a product, many design principles, tools, methods or knowledge are applicable to design research.A corollary of the principle is that in order to succeed in contemporary research environments, design researchers would gain significant benefit such as improving the success rate of their research projects, if they exercise design methods and tools in designing their research. By exercising these methods, researchers would gain quick and rich feedback about the methods they develop; they would become aware of issues that require users’ perspective that could not be possible without their own practical use.The PRP makes participants in design research aware of the reflexive opportunity in studying design that could be mobilized to advancing their practice and making their research results more effective. Notwithstanding, adopting the PRP is not easy; therefore, it is presented as a challenge to design research. Four examples of using the PRP as a guiding principle in research are presented to demonstrate its importance and benefits.
Highlights
There are no statistics available on the success or failure of research projects to meet their stated objectives
The only way to succeed in product development and stay competitive is through engineering design (e.g., Committee 1991; Shah & Hazelrigg 1996); the same holds for design research
The Principle of Reflexive Practice (PRP) suggests that given that research outcome and research itself are humanmade artifacts, that everything related to design research could be subjected to design principles, knowledge, methods or tools, and that this is probably the most effective way to address it
Summary
There are no statistics available on the success or failure of research projects to meet their stated objectives. There are countless opportunities in professional work and daily life to bring such criticism upon ourselves Disciplines such as engineering, public policy, psychology, sociology, or education, that deal with human activities such as design, decision-making, learning, research, or knowledge management present a challenge to their professionals. As these professionals develop principles, knowledge, methods or tools aimed at assisting practitioners in these disciplines, they are practitioners that at the same time can use their own research results. A more in-depth analysis of the impact of different interpretations of reflexivity in design could be explored in a separate study
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
