Abstract
Abstract In Chapter 6 of Objects of Credence, Anna Mahtani argues that the opacity of credence raises difficulties for the Principal Principle and proposes a revised principle relating credence and chance that avoids it. In this comment on her book, I both defend Mahtani’s proposed principle against a charge of triviality and argue that the opacity of belief does not threaten the role of chance in guiding credence.
Full Text
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Published version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have