Abstract

Research has shown that warmth and competence are the fundamental content dimensions underlying social judgment, and warmth judgments are primary. However, the overwhelming majority of research concerning “primacy-of-warmth” rests on trait judgment or lexical recognition, and little attention has been paid to spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) that are made on exposure to trait-implying behaviors. Two studies were performed to examine the primacy-of-warmth effect on STIs and to further explore whether trait valence moderates the effect. Consistent with our expectations, the results of Experiments 1 and 2 (for spontaneous trait activation and spontaneous trait binding, respectively) consistently demonstrated the primacy-of-warmth on STIs. Participants were more likely to draw STIs from behaviors implying warmth traits than those implying competence traits. Moreover, the primacy-of-warmth effect on STIs was moderated by trait valence. In concrete terms, participants were more likely to draw STIs from negative warmth behavioral sentences than negative competence behavioral sentences, whereas participants draw STIs from positive warmth behavioral sentences and from positive competence behavioral sentences equally. An original contribution made by our study is that we obtained the primacy-of-warmth effect on STIs, providing further evidence for the primacy-of-warmth effect in the domain of implicit social cognition.

Highlights

  • Previous theory and research have shown that two fundamental content dimensions underlie social judgment (Judd et al, 2005; Abele and Wojciszke, 2007; Fiske et al, 2007)

  • A main effect was reliable for trait valence, F(1,39) = 11.36, p < 0.01, η2p = 0.23, which indicated that it took participants more time to infer negative traits from behaviors than positive traits

  • The primacy-of-warmth effect on spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) was moderated by trait valence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous theory and research have shown that two fundamental content dimensions underlie social judgment (Judd et al, 2005; Abele and Wojciszke, 2007; Fiske et al, 2007). Different names have been given to the two fundamental content dimensions. Researchers refer to communion and agency, warmth and competence, morality and competence, socially and intellectually good or bad, and trust and autonomy, to name just a few (Rosenberg et al, 1968; Fiske et al, 2002; Wojciszke, 2005; Abele and Wojciszke, 2007; Cuddy et al, 2008). The different names of these two dimensions are used in different research areas of psychology. Warmth and competence are ubiquitous in research on stereotype and intergroup

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.