Abstract
In this piece, we respond to comments on our earlier essay on access pricing in telecommunications on the efficient component-pricing rule (ECPR) that appeared in the Winter, 1994 issue of the Yale Journal on Regulation. We are in essential agreement with the comments of Professor Alfred Kahn and Dr. William Taylor, and we are unconvinced by Dr. William Tye's criticisms of the ECPR. We also comment on the decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the House of Lords, which embraced the ECPR as a principle consistent with New Zealand antitrust law. We conclude with some remarks about the likelihood that other courts and regulators, particularly those in the United States, will adopt the ECPR.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
