Abstract

The Price decision and game process is studied between mobile network provider (MP) and service provider (SP) in China mobile internet supply chain. The game results in decentralized decision pattern and centralized pattern are analyzed and compared. The results show that centralized decision can make Pareto improvement, where the consumer payments are lower, but supply chain profits are higher than which under decentralized pattern. The cooperation between MP and SP needs coordination based on the mechanisms of explicit and incentive revenue share contract.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call