Abstract
Watch the VIDEO.We need to ask ourselves why we support Open Access: is our main goal to provide free and unrestricted access to the results of scholarly research to everyone who might be interested, or is it to change the current model for scholarly communication because we consider it inefficient as well as too expensive? If our main goal is to open up research results as much as possible, there seems to be little reason to part ways with legacy publishers, who should – after initial resistance – prove to be willing partners as long as academic institutions are equally willing to pay. If, on the other hand, the intention is to introduce a new model for scholarly communication that operates according to cost-effective standards, then it seems very unlikely for academic institutions to achieve this together with the same partners, who have worked according to a commercial logic for decades. In short: do we want evolution or revolution?If we want a revolution, then it will not be brought by Green OA, which provides too little challenge for the traditional model for the publication and distribution of scholarly work. It will also not be brought by for-profit Gold OA, which is extremely expensive (even more so than the traditional model) and keeps commercial partners in control of the dissemination of research results. Therefore, an alternative model for no-profit Gold OA is on the rise, namely Fair Open Access. Publications in Fair Open Access are immediately freely available to all, are produced according to cost-effective (rather than commercial) principles and guarantee full control of researchers over the entire publication process.KU Leuven has been supporting Green OA through its institutional repository Lirias for many years already. As it is clear, however, that Green OA provides some but certainly not all of the solutions, the university was looking to intensify its efforts to maximize scholarly exchange, collaboration and innovation. This resulted in the establishment of the KU Leuven Fund for Fair Open Access in March 2018. This fund provides financial support for the production costs of OA monographs published by Leuven University Press as well as articles in selected OA journals, on the condition that these journals are published according to the Fair OA model and maintain the highest academic standards.This paper analyses current business models for OA, explains the reasoning behind the establishment of the KU Leuven Fund for Fair Open Access, discusses its day-to-day operation and presents its initial results.
Highlights
In line with funder requirements and research policy in Belgium focus on Green OA obligation to deposit, no obligation to publish in OA focus on AAMs of journal articles institutional repository is used to realize Green OA, but only if authors and publishers allow this accommodating for publishers no real measures to fundamentally change scholarly communication beyond Green OA:
In reality: yearly spend on for-profit Gold OA for journal articles (APCs or other author fees paid outside of the library) at the very least 380.000€ N.B. on top of collection budget spent by KU Leuven Libraries – almost €9.000.000/year N.B. on top of other costs for academic publishing – cost unknown
1. ethical reasons results of scholarly research available to general public regardless of whether the parties interested are affiliated with an university or not results of scholarly research available to scholars all over the world regardless of whether these scholars are affiliated with an institution which can afford to buy a lot of academic publications or not
Summary
- Gold OA journals and monographs of Leuven University Press - moderate support under the radar for Gold no-APC/BPC OA: e.g. Open Library of Humanities, Language Science Press - (officially) no support for for-profit Gold OA APCs/BPCs, whether or not Hybrid) https://lup.be/pages/open-access-copyright 5 https://www.openlibhums.org/. In reality: yearly spend on for-profit Gold OA for journal articles (APCs or other author fees paid outside of the library) at the very least 380.000€ N.B. on top of collection budget spent by KU Leuven Libraries – almost €9.000.000/year N.B. on top of other costs for academic publishing (e.g. monograph fees) – cost unknown
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.