Abstract

BackgroundDelirium is a very common and distressing neuropsychiatric syndrome in palliative care. Increasing age, the presence of dementia and advanced cancer are well-known predisposing risk factors for delirium development. Sleep-wake cycle disturbance is frequently seen during delirium and melatonin has a pivotal role in the regulation of circadian rhythms. Current evidence across various settings suggests a potential preventative role for melatonin in patients at risk of delirium, but no studies are currently reported in patients with advanced cancer. The aim of this article is to describe the design of a feasibility study that is being conducted to inform a larger randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial (RCT) to evaluate the role of exogenously administered melatonin in preventing delirium in patients with advanced cancer.Methods/DesignAdult patients with a cancer diagnosis who are admitted to the palliative care unit will be randomized into a treatment or placebo group. The pharmacological intervention consists of a single daily dose of immediate-release melatonin (3 mg) at 21:00 ± 1 h, from day 1 to day 28 of admission. The primary objective of this initial study is to assess the feasibility of conducting the proposed RCT by testing recruitment and retention rates, appropriateness of study outcome measures, acceptability of study procedures and effectiveness of the blinding process. The primary outcome measure of the proposed larger RCT is time to first inpatient incident episode of delirium. We also plan to collect data on incident rates of delirium and patient-days of delirium, adjusting for length of admission.DiscussionThe outcomes of this feasibility study will provide information on recruitment and retention rates, protocol violation frequency, effectiveness of the blinding process, acceptability of the study procedures, and safety of the proposed intervention. This will inform the design of a fully powered randomized controlled trial to evaluate the preventative role of melatonin administration in patients with advanced cancer.Trial registrationRegistered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02200172 Registered on 21 July 2014.Health Canada protocol number: BRI-MELAT-2013 (Final approved protocol version (Version 3): 18 June 2014) (Notice of Amended Authorization (NOA) received 14 November 2014).Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1525-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Delirium is a very common and distressing neuropsychiatric syndrome in palliative care

  • The outcomes of this feasibility study will provide information on recruitment and retention rates, protocol violation frequency, effectiveness of the blinding process, acceptability of the study procedures, and safety of the proposed intervention. This will inform the design of a fully powered randomized controlled trial to evaluate the preventative role of melatonin administration in patients with advanced cancer

  • This paper describes the design of a pilot and feasibility study to examine the preventative role of exogenous melatonin administration in patients with advanced cancer who are at risk of delirium

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Delirium is a very common and distressing neuropsychiatric syndrome in palliative care. Current evidence across various settings suggests a potential preventative role for melatonin in patients at risk of delirium, but no studies are currently reported in patients with advanced cancer. Delirium is a very common and distressing neuropsychiatric syndrome for patients and their families in palliative care settings [1,2,3]. Delirium occurrence rates of over 80 % have been reported in the last hours and days before death [4, 5] Conducting research in this population is challenging and, not surprisingly literature, data are limited owing to patient frailty and high attrition rates in association with the context of advanced disease [6,7,8]. It often occurs at a critical juncture in advanced disease, when a preexisting narrow window of opportunity to communicate with family may be further compromised

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call