Abstract
The natural course of signs and laboratory test findings indicative of bacterial vaginosis was followed in an observational noninterventive 6-month longitudinal study of 270 asymptomatic women. Only the minority of positive Gardnerella vaginalis cultures (5 of 33), wet mount clue cells (5 of 14), sniff tests (3 of 11), Papanicolaou smear clue cells (0 of 5), and discharge consistent with bacterial vaginosis (11 of 49) persisted in the absence of therapy. While these four laboratory parameters as well as chromatographic succinate/lactate ratios (performed only on the final visit) were abnormal significantly more often in patients with abnormal discharge than in those with normal discharge (p = 0.006, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0003, and p = 0.002, respectively), all were insensitive predictors of abnormal discharge with sensitivities ranging between 10.6% and 20.2% and abnormal test predictive values between 30.6% and 65.2%. We conclude that G. vaginalis represents indigenous flora in some normal women and that therapy is unwarranted for the incidental finding of a positive laboratory indicator of bacterial vaginosis in the patient without symptoms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.