The prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast or left ventricular thrombus in patients with HFrEF.

Abstract

AimsThis study aimed to determine prevalence, predictors, and association with ischaemic stroke risk of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) or left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).Methods and resultsClinical, echocardiographic, and follow‐up data from January 2009 through February 2019 were retrospectively extracted from electronic medical records of patients with heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% by echocardiography on admission, with follow‐up to February 2020. Of 9485 consecutive patients with HFrEF, 123 (1.3%) presented LVT and 331 (3.5%) presented SEC. Patients with vs. those without SEC/LVT had larger left ventricular end‐diastolic volume (199.5 ± 77.7 vs. 165.8 ± 61.3 mL, P < 0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fractions (29.5 ± 7.0% vs. 33.7 ± 5.5%, P < 0.001), and more often ischaemic cardiomyopathy, apical aneurysm, chronic kidney diseases, and smoking habit. In Cox regression analysis, SEC and LVT were independent predictors for ischaemic stroke occurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.74–3.31; HR = 4.52, 95% CI: 2.77–7.40, both P < 0.001]. In patients with those without SEC or LVT, stroke risk was higher among those not on anticoagulants (HR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.85–3.53; HR = 4.71, 95% CI: 2.84–7.81, both P < 0.001), but similar among those on anticoagulants (P > 0.05). In patients with sinus rhythm, the associations between SEC/LVT and ischaemic stroke persist with HRs of 2.57 (95% CI: 1.69–3.92) and 5.74 (95% CI: 3.38–9.75).ConclusionsIn patients with HFrEF, SEC was not uncommon and increased risk of ischaemic stroke as well as LVT. Anticoagulants could play a role in the reduction of stroke risk, suggesting that patients with SEC/LVT, even those in sinus rhythm, would benefit from systemic anticoagulation treatment.