Abstract
Sarcopenia is associated with increased mortality. European and North American recommended screening for low muscle mass uses gender specific cut points, with no adjustment for ethnicity. We wished to determine whether the prevalence of sarcopenia was altered by ethnicity in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. We measured appendicular lean mass indexed to height (ALMI) in PD patients by segmental bioimpedance and determined sarcopenia using different cut off points for reduced muscle mass. We measured ALMI in 434 PD patients, 55.1% males, mean age 55.3 ± 16.2 years, 32.3% diabetic, 54.1% white, 23.7% Asian, 19.1% black. ALMI was lower in Asian women, compared to white and black women (6.4 ± 1.1 vs. 6.6 ± 1.0 and 6.9 ± 1.4 kg/m2), and lower in Asian men (7.5 ± 1.3 vs. 8.5 ± 1.2 and 8.7 ± 1.3 kg/m2), p < 0.001. Depending on the ALM/ALMI cut point; the prevalence of sarcopenia was greater in Asian patients (25.6-41.2% using North American or European cut points) compared to white (12.3-18.7%) and black patients (3.8-15.7%), p < 0.001, but <11% when using Asian-specific cut points. The prevalence of sarcopenia obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) was <3%, for all groups. There was no association with duration of PD, dialysis prescription, residual renal function or small solute clearances. There is no universally agreed consensus definition for loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) and current European and North American recommended cut points for screening are adjusted only for gender. As body composition differs also with age and ethnicity, then ideally cut points should be based on age, gender and ethnicity normative values.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.