The Prevalence and Utilization of Prehospital IV Access in Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency Department.

Abstract

Despite the pivotality of emergency medical services (EMS) in prehospital care for patient stabilization, prehospital intravenous(IV) access, a standard practice, remains an ambiguity in Saudi Arabia in terms of its prevalence of placement, justification, and utilization. In this study, we aim to estimate the prevalence and utilization rate of prehospital IV access placement in patients transported to King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH)Emergency Medicine Department in Riyadh by EMS and determine the relationship between the prevalence and utilization rate of prehospital IV access in Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) levels 1 and 2in trauma and non-trauma patients. This observational cross-sectional study was conducted over six months. A total of 181 cases of CTASlevels 1 and 2 adult patients were included. Data were collected by trained nurses using convenient sampling through an author-developed questionnaire. The prevalence of prehospital IV line placement was 28.7%, with a utilization rate of 50%, and was notably higher among CTAS level 1 cases (69.2%). Additionally, trauma cases had a higher prevalence of prehospital IV access (53.5%) compared to medical cases (odds ratio (OR): 4.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.73, 4.73, p<0.05). Among patients with prehospital IV lines, the majority (92.3%) were patent and functional. Upon arrival, 73.1% of patients had their prehospital IV line replaced, with hospital protocol being the most common reason for the replacement (73.7%). A minority of the patients had prehospital vascular access, and of those, half remained unused. Trauma cases and CTAS level 1 patients had a higher prevalence and utilization of prehospital IV access. Furthermore, trauma cases were more associated with prehospital IV access establishment and utilization.