Abstract
Justice is a perpetual topic for mankind. International criminal justice is generally regarded as criminal justice or global justice in academia, but neither of them can provide comprehensive content for international criminal justice alone. In order to make international criminal justice be correctly understood, both theories must be integrated. But there is tension between the two propositions. In order to bridge the gap between the two theories, it is necessary to build a bridge for the integration of the two theories ― international criminal justice must incorporate the “international” element. “Internationality” is an indispensable element of international criminal justice. Through the historical investigation of the concepts of “global justice” and “criminal justice”, this paper believes that the International Criminal Court must fully consider the “international” characteristics of “individual” embedded in “state” when allocating “negative evaluation” between different cases. The authority of the International Criminal Court can be maintained only when the “internationality” of international criminal justice is fully considered by the International Criminal Court.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
