Abstract
Attempts to prepare [RhX(CO)(PAr 3) 2] complexes have shown that when X = I these complexes are far less stable than the well-known [RhCl(CO)(PPh 3) 2]. The bromo complexes [RhBr(CO)(PAr 3) 2] (Ar = C 6H 5, p-EtC 6H 4) can be prepared by simple halide exchange from their respective chloro complexes. However a similar attempt to prepare the iodo complexes was frustrated by dissociative equilibria; in the absence of oxygen dimers were formed, whereas in the presence of oxygen polymeric oxygen complexes were formed. The ease of dissociation of phosphine can be attributed to the greater steric crowding in the iodo complexes than in the chloro and bromo complexes. The complex [RhI(CO)PPh 3) 2] could only be obtained in the presence of excess PPh 3, which inhibits the dissociation. The identification of this monomer was further complicated by the previously unnoticed presence of both cis and trans isomers in the solid state.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.