The Preoperative Evaluation in Patients with Endocarditis: Is Cardiac Catheterization Necessary?

Abstract

We retrospectively compared clinical assessment and cardiac catheterization to subsequent surgical findings with regard to specific valvular involvement, hemodynamic status, and presence of myocardial abscess in patients recommended for cardiac surgery for endocarditis. Of 105 consecutive patients with endocarditis, 19 met one or more of the following criteria suggesting the need for early surgery: congestive heart failure; systemic emboli; persistent infections or new conduction abnormalities. Of these 19 patients, seven had prosthetic cardiac valves. Clinical assessment was highly sensitive (95 percent) and specific (89 percent) for specific valvular involvement and was also highly sensitive and specific in evaluating myocardial abscess and congestive heart failure; however, clinical assessment could not identify the source of infection in one patient with multiple prosthetic valves, did not define the specific valve in one patient with right-sided endocarditis, and overestimated the severity of mitral regurgitation in one patient who had normal pressures and flows at catheterization. Catheterization incorrectly predicted multivalvular involvement in four patients. At catheterization, only one patient experienced evidence of clinical deterioration, and this was probably not related to the procedure. We conclude that although clinical assessment is correct in most patients, it may on occasion lead to an erroneous conclusion. Catheterization and angiograms are of value in the preoperative evaluation of patients with endocarditis, particularly in cases where the clinical assessment is ambiguous or uncertain. The procedures can be performed at low risk, and the information obtained may substantially influence management in some cases.