The Predictive Role of Intraoperative Visual Evoked Potentials in Visual Improvement After Endoscopic Pituitary Tumor Resection in Large and Complex Tumors: Description and Validation of a Method

33. Intraoperative visual evoked potential monitoring and its pitfalls

The clinical application of intraoperative visual evoked potential in recurrent craniopharyngiomas resected by extended endoscopic endonasal surgery

To clarify the usefulness of intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in aneurysm surgery, we examined the correlation between the VEP amplitude and postoperative visual function in patients who underwent aneurysmal clipping. We developed a new light-stimulating device and introduced electroretinogram (ERG) to ascertain retinal light stimulation under total venous anesthesia. The new stimulating device consists of 16 red light-emitting diodes embedded in a soft silicon disk to avoid deviation of the light axis after frontal scalp-flap reflection. Under total venous anesthesia with propofol, ERG and VEP were recorded in 50 patients who were at intraoperative risk for visual impairment. Stable ERG and VEP recordings were obtained in 98 eyes. In one eye, stable ERG was recorded but VEP could not be obtained, because the eye manifested severe preoperative visual dysfunction. In the another eye, the disappearance of ERG and VEP after frontal scalp-flap reflection suggested technical failure attributable to deviation of the light axis. The criterion for amplitude aggravation was defined as a 50% decrease in amplitude compared to the control level. Of 93 eyes without amplitude changes, 2 manifested improved visual function postoperatively and 91 showed no change. Of 3 eyes with intraoperative VEP deterioration and subsequent recovery upon changing the operative maneuver 3 exhibited no change. The VEP amplitude decreased without subsequent recovery to 50% of the control level in both eyes of 1 patient, and she developed homonymous quadrant hemianopsia postoperatively. With the strategy introduced here it is possible to record stable VEP in almost all cases without severe visual dysfunction. In some patients, postoperative visual deterioration can be avoided by intraoperative VEP monitoring. All patients without an intraoperative decrease in the VEP amplitude were without postoperative deterioration in visual function, suggesting that intraoperative VEP monitoring may help to prevent postoperative visual dysfunction in aneurysmal clipping.

To obtain a clinically useful method of intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials (VEPs), the authors developed a new light-stimulating device and introduced electroretinography (ERG) to ascertain retinal light stimulation after induction of venous anesthesia. The new stimulating device consists of 16 red light-emitting diodes embedded in a soft silicone disc to avoid deviation of the light axis after frontal scalp-flap reflection. After induction of venous anesthesia with propofol, the authors performed ERG and VEP recording in 100 patients (200 eyes) who were at intraoperative risk for visual impairment. Stable ERG and VEP recordings were obtained in 187 eyes. In 12 eyes, stable ERG data were recorded but VEPs could not be obtained, probably because all 12 eyes manifested severe preoperative visual dysfunction. The disappearance of ERG data and VEPs in the 13th eye after frontal scalp-flap reflection suggested technical failure attributable to deviation of the light axis. The criterion for amplitude changes was defined as a 50% increase or decrease in amplitude compared with the control level. In 1 of 187 eyes the authors observed an increase in intraoperative amplitude and postoperative visual function improvement. Of 169 eyes without amplitude changes, 17 manifested improved visual function postoperatively, 150 showed no change, and 2 worsened (1 patient with a temporal tumor developed a slight visual field defect in both eyes). Of 3 eyes with intraoperative VEP deterioration and subsequent recovery upon changing the operative maneuver, 1 improved and 2 exhibited no change. The VEP amplitude decreased without subsequent recovery to 50% of the control level in 14 eyes, and all of these developed various degrees of postoperative deterioration of visual function. With the strategy introduced here it is possible to record intraoperative VEPs in almost all patients except in those with severe visual dysfunction. In some patients, postoperative visual deterioration can be avoided or minimized by intraoperative VEP recording. All patients without an intraoperative decrease in the VEP amplitude were without severe postoperative deterioration in visual function, suggesting that intraoperative VEP monitoring may contribute to prevent postoperative visual dysfunction.

Intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potential: introduction of a clinically useful method Sasaki T, Imamura T, Suzuki K, Kasey H, Mankato R, et al. J Neurosurgery 112:273–284, 2010 Object: To obtain a clinically useful method of intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials (VEPs), the authors developed a new light-stimulating device and introduced electroretinography (ERG) to ascertain retinal light stimulation after induction of venous anesthesia. Methods: The new stimulating device consists of 16 red light–emitting diodes embedded in a soft silicone disc to avoid deviation of the light axis after frontal scalp-flap reflection. After induction of venous anesthesia with propofol, the authors performed ERG and VEP recording in 100 patients (200 eyes) who were at intraoperative risk for visual impairment. Results: Stable ERG and VEP recordings were obtained in 187 eyes. In 12 eyes, stable ERG data were recorded but VEPs could not be obtained, probably because all 12 eyes manifested severe preoperative visual dysfunction. The disappearance of ERG data and VEPs in the 13th eye after frontal scalp-flap reflection suggested technical failure attributable to deviation of the light axis. The criterion for amplitude changes was defined as a 50% increase or decrease in amplitude compared with the control level. In 1 of 187 eyes the authors observed an increase in intraoperative amplitude and postoperative visual function improvement. Of 169 eyes without amplitude changes, 17 manifested improved visual function postoperatively, 150 showed no change, and 2 worsened (1 patient with a temporal tumor developed a slight visual field defect in both eyes). Of 3 eyes with intraoperative VEP deterioration and subsequent recovery upon changing the operative maneuver, 1 improved and 2 exhibited no change. The VEP amplitude decreased without subsequent recovery to 50% of the control level in 14 eyes, and all of these developed various degrees of postoperative deterioration of visual function. Conclusions: With the strategy introduced here it is possible to record intraoperative VEPs in almost all patients except in those with severe visual dysfunction. In some patients, postoperative visual deterioration can be avoided or minimized by intraoperative VEP recording. All patients without an intraoperative decrease in the VEP amplitude were without severe postoperative deterioration in visual function, suggesting that intraoperative VEP monitoring may contribute to prevent postoperative visual dysfunction.

Due to the proximity of craniopharyngioma to the optic apparatus, one of the most common complications after surgery is visual deterioration. Intraoperative visual evoked potential (VEP), as a means of real-time visual function monitoring, has been integrated into transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma to predict postoperative visual outcome. Compared with pituitary tumor, craniopharyngioma often adheres to optic nerves, with increased risk of postoperative visual impairment. Furthermore, extended endoscopic endonasal surgery (EEES) can provide direct visualization of the surgical plane between the craniopharyngioma and the optic nerves, which contributes to analysis of the mechanism of real-time VEP changes during surgery. Therefore, VEP monitoring applied during EEES for craniopharyngioma may have more clinical value. However, only 9 patients who underwent EEES with VEP monitoring for craniopharyngioma have been sporadically reported to date. In this paper, the authors present the largest series to date analyzing the clinical value of VEP to predict postoperative visual outcome in adult patients with craniopharyngioma. Sixty-five adult patients who underwent EEES with intraoperative VEP monitoring for primary craniopharyngioma were retrospectively reviewed. The association between changes in VEP amplitude and postoperative visual outcome was determined. In addition, other potential prognostic factors with regard to postoperative visual outcomes were included in the analysis. Gross-total resection was achieved in 59 patients (90.8%). Reproducible and stable VEP was recorded in 128 of 130 eyes (98.5%). During surgery, VEP remained stable in 108 eyes, 10 (9.3%) of which had new visual acuity (VA) and/or visual field (VF) defects after surgery. Transient VEP decrease was recorded in 15 eyes, 4 (26.7%) of which had visual deterioration. Of the 5 eyes with permanent VEP decrease, 3 (60%) experienced postoperative visual impairment. Permanent VEP decrease (OR 19.868, p = 0.007) and tight adhesion (OR 6.104, p = 0.040) were independent adverse factors for postoperative VA deterioration. Tight adhesion (OR 7.150, p = 0.002) and larger tumor volume (OR 1.066, p = 0.001) were significant risk factors for postoperative VF defects. Intraoperative VEP monitoring can serve as a real-time warning to guide surgeons to avoid postoperative visual impairment. It effectively predicted VA changes in adult patients with craniopharyngioma after EEES. Tight adhesion and larger tumor volume were also strong predictors of postoperative visual impairment.

Efficacy of Intraoperative Neurosurgical VEP Monitoring

Postoperative visual outcome is a major concern in transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). Intraoperative visual evoked potential (VEP) monitoring has been reported to have little usefulness in predicting postoperative visual outcome. To re-evaluate its usefulness, we adapted a high-power light-stimulating device with electroretinography (ERG) to ascertain retinal light stimulation. Intraoperative VEP monitoring was conducted in TSSs in 33 consecutive patients with sellar and parasellar tumors under total venous anesthesia. The detectability rates of N75, P100, and N135 were 94.0%, 85.0%, and 79.0%, respectively. The mean latencies and amplitudes of N75, P100, and N135 were 76.8 ± 6.4 msec and 4.6 ± 1.8 μV, 98.0 ± 8.6 msec and 5.0 ± 3.4 μV, and 122.1 ± 16.3 msec and 5.7 ± 2.8 μV, respectively. The amplitude was defined as the voltage difference from N75 to P100 or P100 to N135. The criterion for amplitude changes was defined as a > 50% increase or 50% decrease in amplitude compared to the control level. The surgeon was immediately alerted when the VEP changed beyond these thresholds, and the surgical manipulations were stopped until the VEP recovered. Among the 28 cases with evaluable VEP recordings, the VEP amplitudes were stable in 23 cases and transiently decreased in 4 cases. In these 4 cases, no postoperative vision deterioration was observed. One patient, whose VEP amplitude decreased without subsequent recovery, developed vision deterioration. Intraoperative VEP monitoring with ERG to ascertain retinal light stimulation by the new stimulus device was reliable and feasible in preserving visual function in patients undergoing TSS.

Intraoperative visual evoked potential (VEP) monitoring has been studied mainly in pituitary adenoma, while its role in nonpituitary suprasellar tumors has remained unclear. This study evaluated the predictive usefulness of intraoperative VEP monitoring during endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) and aimed to identify optimal alarm criteria for visual outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 87 patients who underwent EES with intraoperative VEP monitoring between April 2021 and September 2023. Visual outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at short-term (≤3 months) and long-term (12 months) follow-ups, with visual deterioration at these time points defined as worsening of either visual acuity or the visual field. Reductions in the VEP amplitude were quantified using both the maximum intraoperative decrease and the final amplitude after recovery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify the optimal alarm thresholds, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for short-term and long-term visual deteriorations. Short-term and long-term visual deteriorations were detected in 12 (9.2%) and 5 (3.8%) of the 130 analyzed eyes, respectively. ROC curve analyses identified ≥40% and ≥30% reductions in the N75-P100 amplitude as optimal alarm criteria for short-term and long-term visual deteriorations, respectively. A 30% reduction without intraoperative recovery demonstrated markedly higher sensitivity than the conventional 50% alarm threshold for short-term (58.3% vs. 33.3%) and long-term (80.0% vs. 20.0%) outcomes, while maintaining acceptable specificity (82.2% and 80.8%, respectively). A 30% reduction in amplitude represents a more-sensitive and clinically relevant alarm threshold than a 50% reduction for intraoperative VEP monitoring during EES for nonpituitary suprasellar tumors. Incorporating both the magnitude and recovery pattern of VEP amplitude changes may improve the accuracy of predictions of long-term visual deterioration. However, the potential for false positives warrants cautious interpretation, and further studies are needed to validate the impact of intraoperative VEP monitoring on visual outcomes.

The flash visual evoked potential (VEP) is a useful diagnostic modality for visual preservation during surgery. Decreased VEP amplitude is recognized to indicate visual deterioration;however, whether intraoperative VEP can detect visual improvement remains unclear. We describe a craniopharyngioma case with a significant increase in VEP amplitude during surgery. A 67-year-old woman presented with progressive gait disturbance and impaired consciousness. Head magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a sellar-suprasellar tumor compressing the optic chiasm upward with significant ventricular dilation. Her Glasgow Coma Scale was E3V3M5. Visual fields and acuity could not be examined because of impaired consciousness, and she could not see/recognize objects on a table. Preoperative VEP showed reproducible waveforms. Tumor removal by the extended transsphenoidal approach was performed with VEP monitoring. Increased VEP amplitude was observed after dural incision and persisted until the surgery ended. Postoperative VEP waveforms were also reproducible, but visual fields/acuity could not be examined because of cognitive dysfunction. Useful visual function was restored, and she became independent in daily life. The histological diagnosis was craniopharyngioma. The patient underwent ventriculo-peritoneal shunting for hydrocephalus 16 days after tumor removal. The postoperative course was uneventful and she was transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation. Intraoperative VEP may indicate visual improvement during surgery, which is a useful objective assessment for visual function in patients with impaired consciousness and cognitive dysfunction.

Preservation of visual function is important in surgery for suprasellar tumors. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are expected to play an important role in monitoring visual function during surgery. Given the lack of information in this field, the authors aimed to investigate the effects of optic nerve compression caused by suprasellar tumors to understand the possible usefulness of VEP monitoring using off-response (OFR) VEP. Eleven healthy volunteers who underwent surgery for standard record confirmation and 32 patients with optic chiasm lesions who underwent surgery were examined. Preoperative, postoperative, and intraoperative VEPs were recorded. Propofol anesthesia was administered during intraoperative VEP monitoring. Patients who underwent surgery were monitored using the same stimulation method during surgery. Light stimulation was given from a luminant pad on the eyelids, and low-intensity stimulation with continuous 500-msec emission and 500 msec off was performed. The luminescence intensity of the stimulation was at a maximum of 8000 lx with three attenuation steps, each of which was recorded repeatedly. The OFR potentials and delay latencies decreased as stimulus intensity decreased. In the patient with temporal hemianopia, monocular stimulation produced the highest OFR in the contralateral occipital lobe of the stimulated eye. The authors recorded preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative VEP in 32 patients and observed intraoperative changes in 23 patients. In the cases where VEP declined during intraoperative recording, it recovered when surgery was discontinued. Furthermore, 3 patients eventually achieved a higher VEP than that achieved at the beginning of the surgery, and rapid recovery was confirmed with visual field examination immediately after surgery. Of the 5 patients in whom VEP did not recover during surgery, 3 showed decreased visual field and acuity after surgery. In 15 cases, potential dropped temporarily but returned to the original potential, and their visual field recovered after surgery. OFR has a diagnostic element in the visual field, in which the maximal potential was recorded on the opposite side of the stimulus with monocular stimulation. Unambiguous determination required stimulation of different intensities in both eyes or 1 eye and multiple recording electrodes placed in the occiput. Monitoring the OFR provides real-time alerts, making it a valuable tool for visual function evaluation in suprasellar surgery.

Visual evoked potential (VEP) is used as a means of intraoperative visual function monitoring. It remains unclear, however, whether intraoperative VEP monitoring is a means of real-time visual function monitoring that has satisfactory effectiveness and sensitivity. To evaluate this, the relationships between VEP waveform changes in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery and postoperative visual function were analyzed retrospectively. Intraoperative VEP monitoring was carried out during 82 endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgeries for 164 eyes at Nara Medical University Hospital, Nara, Japan under total intravenous anesthesia. Red light flash stimulation was provided to each eye independently. The VEP recording and postoperative visual function were then analyzed. In 160 of 164 eyes (98%), steady VEP monitoring was performed. Stable VEP was acquired from eyes with a corrected visual acuity >0.1. VEP was not recorded in four eyes that had a corrected visual acuity under 0.05. A transient VEP decrease was observed in 26 eyes, 8 of which had improved visual acuity and 18 of which had no change in visual acuity. A permanent gradual VEP decrease occurred in eight eyes; this finding did not correspond to a change in visual function. The visual acuity of the patients who underwent the transsphenoidal operation in our study did not worsen. Intraoperative monitoring of VEP predicts postoperative visual function, and a reversible change in VEP indicates that visual function will be preserved. Intraoperative VEP monitoring will be mandatory for surgeries harboring a risk of visual impairment.

Objectives: During surgeries that put the visual pathway at risk of injury, continuous monitoring of the visual function is desirable. However, the intraoperative monitoring of the visual evoked potential (VEP) is not yet widely used. We evaluate here the clinical utility of intraoperative VEP monitoring. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively 46 consecutive surgeries in 2011-2013. High luminance stimulating devices delivered flash stimuli on the closed eyelid during intravenous anesthesia. We monitored VEP features N75 and P100 and took patients' preoperative and postoperative visual function from patient charts. Postoperative ophthalmologic workup was performed in 25 (54%) patients and preoperatively in 28 (61%) patients. Results: VEP recordings were feasible in 62 of 85 eyes (73%) in 46 patients. All 23 eyes without VEP had impaired vision. During surgery, VEPs remained stable throughout surgery in 50 eyes. In 44 of these, visual function did not deteriorate and three patients (6 eyes) developed hemianopia. VEP decreased transiently in 10 eyes and visual function of all was preserved. VEPs were lost permanently in 2 eyes in two patients without new postoperative visual impairment. Conclusions: Satisfactory intraoperative VEP monitoring was feasible in all patients except in those with severe visual impairment. Preservation of VEPs predicted preserved visual function. During resection of lesions in the visual cortex, VEP monitoring could not detect new major visual field defects due to injury in the posterior visual pathway. Intraoperative VEPs were sensitive enough to detect vascular damage during aneurysm clipping and mechanical manipulation of the anterior visual pathway in an early reversible stage. Intraoperative VEP monitoring influenced surgical decisions in selected patients and proved to be a useful supplement to the toolbox of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

The aim of this study was to elucidate the relationship between changes in the intraoperative visual evoked potential (VEP) waveform and postoperative visual functional outcomes. Between February 2009 and December 2010, we performed endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for sellar or perisellar lesions in 65 consecutive patients with intraoperative VEP monitoring using scalp electrodes under total venous anesthesia. Among the 65 patients, 53 patients were followed-up with postoperative visual function evaluation. VEP waveforms measured at baseline were compared with those obtained toward the end of surgery and the association between changes in VEP waveforms and visual outcomes measured preoperatively and postoperatively were assessed. Reproducible waveforms were obtained intraoperatively in 95 of 106 eyes (89.6%). Of the 95 eyes with reproducible VEP, 64 eyes had stable VEP during the surgery, 19 eyes showed VEP improvement, and 12 eyes had VEP deterioration. Of 64 eyes with a stable VEP, 42 showed no change in visual acuity postoperatively, 13 manifested improvement, and 9 worsened. Of 19 eyes with intraoperative VEP improvement, 13 exhibited no change, 4 improved, and 2 worsened postoperatively. Among 12 eyes with VEP deterioration, just 2 eyes showed visual worsening while the other 10 did not change or improved. Postoperative visual evaluation revealed no light perception in 2 eyes whose intraoperative VEP waveforms were stable throughout the surgery. Intraoperative monitoring of VEP with scalp electrodes under total venous anesthesia had a reproducibility of 89.6% during transsphenoidal surgery for sellar or perisellar lesions. However, the intraoperative VEP waveforms showed no association with postoperative visual outcomes.

ObjectivesDuring surgeries that put the visual pathway at risk of injury, continuous monitoring of the visual function is desirable. However, the intraoperative monitoring of the visual evoked potential (VEP) is not yet widely used. We evaluate here the clinical utility of intraoperative VEP monitoring.MethodsWe analyzed retrospectively 46 consecutive surgeries in 2011-2013. High luminance stimulating devices delivered flash stimuli on the closed eyelid during intravenous anesthesia. We monitored VEP features N75 and P100 and took patients' preoperative and postoperative visual function from patient charts. Postoperative ophthalmologic workup was performed in 25 (54%) patients and preoperatively in 28 (61%) patients.ResultsVEP recordings were feasible in 62 of 85 eyes (73%) in 46 patients. All 23 eyes without VEP had impaired vision. During surgery, VEPs remained stable throughout surgery in 50 eyes. In 44 of these, visual function did not deteriorate and three patients (6 eyes) developed hemianopia. VEP decreased transiently in 10 eyes and visual function of all was preserved. VEPs were lost permanently in 2 eyes in two patients without new postoperative visual impairment.ConclusionsSatisfactory intraoperative VEP monitoring was feasible in all patients except in those with severe visual impairment. Preservation of VEPs predicted preserved visual function. During resection of lesions in the visual cortex, VEP monitoring could not detect new major visual field defects due to injury in the posterior visual pathway. Intraoperative VEPs were sensitive enough to detect vascular damage during aneurysm clipping and mechanical manipulation of the anterior visual pathway in an early reversible stage. Intraoperative VEP monitoring influenced surgical decisions in selected patients and proved to be a useful supplement to the toolbox of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.