Abstract
International investment arbitration has become a contentiously discussed issue in Europe. Opposing voices, however, too often disregard the merits of this method of dispute settlement. This often leads to categorical opposition within the public rather than concrete proposals. This paper aims at formulating a constructive critique, viewing the controversy as a conflict between pragmatism and justice. Drawing on Jurgen Habermas and Rainer Forst, it is argued that the system lacks legitimacy because it is not sufficiently subordinated to common societal norms. To gain control over the international investment arbitration system and with it basic legitimacy, the paper builds up to suggest an international investment appeals facility.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
