Abstract

Abstract Background Plagiarism is a cosmopolitan scourge, which might lead to serious consequences. The Faculty of Medicine of Tunis (FMT), involved in the international accreditation process, intends to fight vigorously against plagiarism. From this perspective, the present study was undertaken and aimed to explore the positions and attitudes of FMT's faculty members towards plagiarism and the different factors influencing them. Methods It was a descriptive cross-sectional survey conducted among faculty members of the FMT during the academic year 2018-2019 using the validated English version of the 'Attitudes Towards Plagiarism' (ATP) questionnaire distributed online with Google forms. The ATP questionnaire consisted of 29 items divided into three factors: positive attitude, negative attitude and subjective norms towards plagiarism. Results A total of 340 faculty members responded to the questionnaire. Mean scores for positive attitude and subjective norms were 28.8±6.9 and 24.6±4.9 respectively, corresponding to low to moderate scores. The mean score of negative attitude was 22.4±2.6, matching a moderate score. Interpretation of these scores revealed an unfavorable attitude of the faculty members towards plagiarism and the belief that such behavior is associated with social disapproval and rejection. However, the temptation of plagiarism was palpable and self-plagiarism seemed to be tolerated. ATP scores were significantly influenced by age, grade, work experience, supervision, research activities, and English proficiency. Conclusions This study has pointed out the dilemma facing our faculty in its academic anti-plagiarism crusade. On the one hand, it should ensure the commitment of its faculty members and solicit their mobilization to carry on this fight, but on the other it should put in place clear disincentive policies to prevent plagiarism and cheating and apply them in an equal and transparent way between faculty members and students. Key messages This study showed unfavorable attitudes of Tunisian faculty members toward plagiarism. Self-plagiarism seemed to be tolerated.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call