Abstract
First counterexamples are given to a basic question raised in [10]. The paper considers the space of orderings (X,G) of the function field of a real irreducible conic [Formula: see text] over the field ℚ of rational numbers. It is shown that the pp conjecture fails to hold for such a space of orderings when [Formula: see text] has no rational points. In this case, it is shown that the pp conjecture "almost holds" in the sense that, if a pp formula holds on each finite subspace of (X,G), then it holds on each proper subspace of (X,G). For pp formulas which are product-free and 1-related, the pp conjecture is known to be true, at least if the stability index is finite [11]. The counterexamples constructed here are the simplest sort of pp formulas which are not product-free and 1-related.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
