Abstract

AbstractRecent research on Roma stigmatization has tended to focus on the marginal socio‐economic and spatial position of Roma people within European societies, with poverty, persistent inequalities and substandard housing conditions (for example, ghettoization) highlighting their differential treatment. Central to such accounts are group images and stereotypes of Roma as ‘benefit scroungers’ and/or ‘beggars’ lacking notions of self‐restraint and social responsibility. This body of research is hugely important in terms of its contribution to an understanding of the complex dynamics of marginalization and stigmatization of poor Roma households. Yet not all Roma are characterized by poverty and economic hardship. This article explores the neglected experiences of wealthy Roma within urban spaces in Romania. It draws on empirical evidence from interviews with Roma families, leaders and local authorities. Our analysis exposes the way in which Roma are vehemently stigmatized regardless of their economic position or housing circumstances and highlights deep underlying sentiments towards them within Romanian society. We critique Wacquant's concept of territorial stigmatization by applying it to wealthy groups outwith typical areas of relegation (for example, Roma ghettos) within the specific urban context of post‐socialist Romania. While our analysis points to the internalization of stigma, we also identify distinct defensive strategies wealthy Roma employ to counter and avoid stigmatization. We suggest that a focus on the neglected spaces of wealthy Roma groups can facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the distinct urban power relations that shape Roma stigmatization, reveal how this long‐term process has recently been accentuated within Europe alongside a more overt populist and anti‐Roma political agenda, and contribute to the development and refinement of Wacquant's thesis.

Highlights

  • Contemporary research on Roma in post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) has emphasized the marginal socio-economic position of many Roma communities and their spatial confinement within ghettos characterized by an inhospitable environment and substandard housing conditions (Creţan and Turnock, 2008; Berescu, 2011; Vincze and Raţ, 2013; Filčák and Steger, 2014; Walach, 2015; Powell and Lever, 2017)

  • We suggest that the case of wealthy Roma ofers new empirical insights into our understanding of the dynamics of Roma stigmatization, and has broader implications for the theory of territorial stigmatization––for its extension and refinement

  • Following Elias and Scotson ([1965] 1994), we tentatively suggest that stigmatization responses to wealthy Roma may be intensiied, especially if the wealthy Roma reside in large properties (‘Gypsy palaces’) in central locations; this intensiication can be attributed to the perceived challenge this represents to non-Roma and to their assumed social superiority

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Contemporary research on Roma in post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) has emphasized the marginal socio-economic position of many Roma communities and their spatial confinement within ghettos characterized by an inhospitable environment and substandard housing conditions (Creţan and Turnock, 2008; Berescu, 2011; Vincze and Raţ, 2013; Filčák and Steger, 2014; Walach, 2015; Powell and Lever, 2017). We conclude by suggesting that a focus on the neglected experiences and spaces of wealthy Roma groups in other spatial and national contexts can contribute to an understanding of the long-term group stigmatization of Roma by focusing attention on the power relations and group dynamics that give rise to the dominant perception of Roma as inferior, regardless of their individual or family characteristics, or their housing and economic circumstances. While the fortunes and social positioning of Roma in Romania can be said to luctuate, and while communism is a key period in this regard, the dominant historical narrative is one of intense persecution and stigmatization, in the course of which the Roma were constructed and viewed as an inferior social group at odds with normative notions of ‘Europeanness’ or ‘civilisation’ (Powell and Lever, 2017) This historical context and the complicity of the Romanian state and the political establishment within it is a key component of understanding the empirical indings that follow. In the case of European Roma communities this raises profound questions about current, and invariably ahistorical, policy attempts at Roma integration, which are largely premised on the facilitation of housing, economic and educational integration

Methods
Limitations of the research
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.