Abstract
AbstractGeophysicists depend on rock physics relationships to interpret resistivity and seismic velocity in terms of rock porosity, but it has proven difficult to capture the effect of pore geometry on such relations through simple and easy to apply formulae. Inclusion modeling relates moduli to porosity through an equivalent grain or pore aspect ratio but often fails to account for observed trends, whereas empirical relations can be hard to extrapolate beyond their range of validity, often giving incorrect results in the low and high porosity limits. We show that introducing a power‐law relationship between porosity and equivalent grain or pore aspect ratio allows inclusion models to reproduce five published empirical resistivity‐porosity and velocity‐porosity relationships, providing a first principles basis for extrapolation to other cases of interest. We find that the deviation of resistivity from Archie's law in carbonates is related to a systematic change of grain shape with porosity, and we derive a new relation that fits carbonate resistivity data with similar accuracy to the Humble equation while being correct at high porosity. We then obtain an analog for the Castagna and Pickett relationships for wet, calcitic rocks, which is valid in the low and high porosity limits, giving rise to a new, physically derived Vp/Vs versus porosity model.
Highlights
An ongoing challenge in rock physics modeling is understanding how electrical and elastic properties vary with porosity for various rock types
We examine if a power-law between pore aspect ratio and porosity in an elastic differential effective medium (DEM) model is beneficial for the elastic modeling of rocks with complex pore geometries
It follows that ξ may be an indicator of how a rock is affected by the physical processes which alter pore geometry such as diagenesis
Summary
Introducing a power-law relation leads to improved modeling of 7 public domain data sets. The differential effective medium model aspect ratio appears to follow a powerlaw with porosity. Introducing a power-law relation leads to alternative models for 5 empirical models
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
