Abstract
Drawing on examples from the post-conflict context in Liberia, this article suggests that the framing of youth as subvertors or as agents of peace is a product of the practices of classifying, including and excluding associated with peacebuilding and reintegration. Such policies, while advancing the rhetoric of inclusion, may fall short of rectifying marginalisation. More prominently they may remain decoupled from the problems of access to socially valued goals such as formal employment. Inaccessibility results in youth's agency and resourcefulness being enacted on the margins as diplomatic interactions, choices and decisions in the everyday. This subaltern form of agency however presents a hopeful position: a form of power and capacity independent of inclusiveness as a policy or strategy, inaccessibility as a structural reality and marginalisation as an outcome. Recognition of youth's subaltern agency can help reorient the rationale for youth-focused programming; it can also encourage a shift in policy thinking about youth's potential contribution to peacebuilding.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
