Abstract

Intensive agriculture is among the main drivers of diversity decline worldwide. In Central Europe, pressures related with agriculture include habitat loss due to the consolidation of farming units, pesticide and fertilizer use, and shortened crop rotations. In recent decades, this development has resulted in a severe decline of agrestal plant communities. Organic farming has been suggested as a biodiversity friendly way of farming, as it strongly restricts the use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers and relies on longer crop rotations. It may thus help in saving agrestal plant communities in the future. In this study, we assessed the long-term effects of three types of arable field management (conventional farming, organic farming, and bio-dynamic farming) on three farms in the federal state of Schleswig-Holstein, Northern Germany. We collected data on above-ground plant communities and seed banks and analyzed them with regards to the impact of the farming system and their position in the field using nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) and linear mixed effects models (LME) combined with ANOVA and Tukey contrast tests. Plants in organically or bio-dynamically managed fields differed in their composition and traits from those occurring in conventionally managed fields, i.e., they showed a preference for higher temperatures and were dominated by insect-pollinated species. While conventional farming had negative effects on vegetation and the seed bank, organic and bio-dynamic farms had neutral or slightly positive effects on both. This highlights the potential of the latter two to conserve species even in an intensively managed landscape. In addition, this may halt or even reverse the decrease in arthropod, bird, and mammal species, since agrestal plants constitute an important component of food-webs in agricultural landscapes.

Highlights

  • Agriculture is among the main drivers of biodiversity decline worldwide [1]

  • Organic farming has been suggested as a biodiversity friendly way of farming, as it strongly restricts the use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers and relies on longer crop rotations

  • The number of individuals of agrestal plants was significantly higher at the field margin compared to the field center in conventional farming (CF) and organic farming (OF) but not in bio-dynamic farming (BDF) (Table 2, Figure 1d)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agriculture is among the main drivers of biodiversity decline worldwide [1]. In Central Europe, pressures related with agriculture include habitat loss due to the consolidation of farming units, pesticide and fertilizer use, and shortened crop rotations [2]. The amount of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizer used per unit of cropland area increased approximately eight times (0.9 to 7.4 gNm-2 cropland yr-1 on average) and three times (0.4 to 1.2 gPm-2 cropland yr-1 on average), respectively, globally between 1961 and 2013 [8]. The consequences of these changes in arable management on agrestal plant species is well documented in numerous studies, which all show a dramatic decrease in agrestal plant diversity [9,10,11,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call