Abstract

Most cereal crops are often damaged by lepidopterous insects. Of recent, fall armyworm, S. frugiperda (J.E. Smith) has resulted into yield and economic loss in many African and Asian countries. This reduces farmers’ income drastically and to overcome this damage, pesticides have been used which are not also environmentally friendly. Experiments were set up to collect data on the potential of three larval predators Orius strigicollis, Micromus angulatus, and Podisus maculiventris against S. frugiperda. The consumption of S. frugiperda larvae by three predators had highly significant effects (P≤0.05) on first, fourth, and sixth instars. No significant difference was reported between M. angulatus and O. strigicollis on second, third and fifth larval instars of S. frugiperda. O. strigicollis consumed more first larval instar (6.2±0.71) of S. frugiperda than M. angulatus (4.9±1.07) and P. maculiventris (4.2±0.74). However, P. maculiventris consumed more second to sixth larval instars of S. frugiperda than other two predators (O. strigicollis and M. angulatus). The predator P. maculiventris is recommended for controlling S. frugiperda in their second to sixth larval instars while O. strigicollis in the first larval instar. It can be also concluded that fourth larval instars of S. frugiperda is more suitable for its control using predator P. maculiventris as compared to other larval instars. This study therefore recommends predator Podisus maculiventris to be used in control of S. frugiperda under laboratory conditions.

Highlights

  • Most cereal crops are often damaged by lepidopterous insects

  • No significant difference was noted between predators M. angulatus and O. strigicollis on the second, third, and fifth larval instars of S. frugiperda

  • The results show that predator O. strigicollis consumed more first larval instar of S. frugiperda than predators M. angulatus and P. maculiventris

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fall armyworm, S. frugiperda (J.E. Smith) has resulted into yield and economic loss in many African and Asian countries (Villa-Castoreña and Catalan-Valencia, 2004). Smith) has resulted into yield and economic loss in many African and Asian countries (Villa-Castoreña and Catalan-Valencia, 2004) This reduces farmers’ income drastically and to overcome this damage, they reported to use various pesticides such as rocket, striker, dudufenos among others, which increase the cost of production. The biological control agents, is smart alternative to the continuous use of pesticides in control of S. frugiperda in crop fields and greenhouses. Biological control agents, predators as an area of focus in this study, have advantage over pesticides because they are relatively permanent, safe, and economical and environmentally friendly

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.