Abstract

Abstract. Since the launch of the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) in 2009, retrieval algorithms designed to infer the column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of carbon dioxide (XCO2) from hyperspectral near-infrared observations of reflected sunlight have been greatly improved. They now generally include the scattering effects of clouds and aerosols, as early work found that absorption-only retrievals, which neglected these effects, often incurred unacceptably large errors, even for scenes with optically thin cloud or aerosol layers. However, these “full-physics” retrievals tend to be computationally expensive and may incur biases from trying to deduce the properties of clouds and aerosols when there are none present. Additionally, algorithms are now available that can quickly and effectively identify and remove most scenes in which cloud or aerosol scattering plays a significant role. In this work, we test the hypothesis that non-scattering, or “clear-sky”, retrievals may perform as well as full-physics retrievals for sufficiently clear scenes. Clear-sky retrievals could potentially avoid errors and biases brought about by trying to infer properties of clouds and aerosols when none are present. Clear-sky retrievals are also desirable because they are orders of magnitude faster than full-physics retrievals. Here we use a simplified version of the Atmospheric Carbon Observations from Space (ACOS) XCO2 retrieval algorithm that does not include the scattering and absorption effects of clouds or aerosols. It was found that for simulated Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) measurements, the clear-sky retrieval had errors comparable to those of the full-physics retrieval. For real GOSAT data, the clear-sky retrieval had errors 0–20 % larger than the full-physics retrieval over land and errors roughly 20–35 % larger over ocean, depending on filtration level. In general, the clear-sky retrieval had XCO2 root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of less than 2.0 ppm, relative to Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) measurements and a suite of CO2 models, when adequately filtered through the use of a custom genetic algorithm filtering system. These results imply that non-scattering XCO2 retrievals are potentially more useful than previous literature suggests, as the filtering methods we employ are able to remove measurements in which scattering can cause significant errors. Additionally, the computational benefits of non-scattering retrievals means they may be useful for certain applications that require large amounts of data but have less stringent error requirements.

Highlights

  • Space-based instruments such as the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT; Yokota et al, 2009) and the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2; Crisp et al, 2008) have been launched with the goal of providing accurate global measurements of greenhouse gas concentrations, including carbon dioxide (CO2)

  • We have shown that clear-sky retrievals can be as accurate as full-physics retrievals for OCO-2 simulations over both land and ocean surfaces when filtering is employed to remove low-quality scenes, including those contaminated by clouds www.atmos-meas-tech.net/9/1671/2016/

  • In this study we evaluated the performance of non-scattering, or “clear-sky”, XCO2 retrievals performed on hyperspectral near-infrared measurements of reflected sunlight by comparing them to “full-physics” XCO2 retrievals, which include scattering and absorption by clouds and aerosols

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Space-based instruments such as the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT; Yokota et al, 2009) and the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2; Crisp et al, 2008) have been launched with the goal of providing accurate global measurements of greenhouse gas concentrations, including carbon dioxide (CO2). The aforementioned problems associated with the fullphysics retrieval algorithm motivated a study of a simplified non-scattering, or “clear-sky”, retrieval to test the hypothesis that it could provide comparably accurate XCO2 measurements, given appropriate filtering of scenes contaminated by clouds and aerosols. We performed full-physics and clear-sky XCO2 retrievals on both simulated OCO-2 measurements and real GOSAT measurements This intentional mismatch in meteorology mimics real-world inaccuracies when measuring a given scene For both the full-physics and clear-sky retrievals performed on simulated measurements, the a priori surface pressure was taken from the NCEP reanalysis data. The GOSAT data set contained retrievals performed on 25 000 real measurements made from April 2009 to December 2012 We included both ocean and land scenes and attempted to represent the majority of surface types across the globe without being regionally biased. OCO-2 and GOSAT retrievals that did not converge in the full-physics retrieval were not used for this study

Methodology
XCO2 validation sources
Pre-filtering
DOGO: Data Ordering through Genetic Optimization
XCO2 retrieval comparison
Summary of OCO-2 error statistics
Summary of GOSAT error statistics
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call