Abstract
AimsAlthough Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HyperBOT) attract our attention successfully these days, it is still full of controversy on the treatment of acute stroke. The aim of this study is to assess the potential long-term neurological consequences and safety of using HyperBOT on intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in the diabetics. MethodsIn this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 79 diabetes patients suffering from acute ICH were randomized to treat for 60 min in a monoplace hyperbaric chamber pressurized with pure oxygen to 2.5-atm absolute (ATA) in the HyperBOT group or 1.5 ATA in the normobaric oxygen therapy (NormBOT) group, which was performed as control. Both short-term and long-term neurological consequences were studied and compared in each group on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS], Barthel Index, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] and Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]. The related complications or side-events of all patients were recorded as well at the final follow-up of six months after onset. ResultsNo distinct difference was observed between each group at one month follow-up. However, in the long-term follow-up of six months, a higher frequency of patients in the HyperBOT group resulted into good outcome with a relative high neurological consequence compared with the NormBOT group (Barthel Index: 85.1% versus 65.6%, P = 0.080; mRS: 89.4% versus 68.8%, P = 0.045; GOS: 83.0% versus 62.5%, P = 0.073; NIHSS: 80.9% versus 56.2%, P = 0.035). ConclusionsEarly HyperBOT was found to be safe and effective with regards to the long-term neurological outcome of diabetic patients suffering from ICH.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.