Abstract
A multileaf collimator (MLC) can be used in parallel opposed techniques as a direct replacement for standard-shaped beam blocks. However, improved shielding is possible if the MLC field is designed to fit a target rather than to mimic a straight-edged block. This study has compared the treatment areas produced by the MLC and by conventionally blocked fields with the target area for 43 parallel opposed treatments. It was found in every case that the MLC treated less than 10% excess tissue, and, in over 70% of patients, the excess was less than 5%. The conventional fields, however, treated more than 10% excess tissue in 70% of patients. The effect of MLC orientation and the benefits of using an MLC are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
